Adam Smith’s Theory of the Persistence of Slavery And its Abolition in Western Europe
نویسنده
چکیده
Adam Smith made two positive claims about slavery in the context of developing economies. First, Smith explains that slavery is in general highly inefficient. By his account, the net product under freedom is 12 times larger than under slavery. Second, he observes that, despite its inefficiencies, slavery persists in most of the world. Taken together, these claims create a fundamental puzzle: Why do elites – owning slaves and holding political control – fail to make themselves better off by freeing their slaves? Smith gives two very different answers to this puzzle. The first is psychological. Smith asserts that people have a fundamental desire to dominate others, and slavery provided that opportunity for slaveholding elites. The first explanation is the most commonly advanced in the literature. Yet no where else does Smith use the assumption of domination. This explanation therefore seems ad hoc. I favor instead Smith’s second explanation. This argument, far less known, involves commitment problems. Freeing the slaves would deprive slaveholders of their property. How would they be compensated? In principle, a long-term compensation scheme could solve this problem. But in the undeveloped societies Smith discusses, such as feudal Europe, long-term contracts were difficult to enforce. Indeed, I show that both parties to the long-term compensation scheme had incentives to dishonor it. In the presence of commitment problems, masters could not be assured they would, in fact, be better off freeing their slaves. Slaveholders therefore rationally avoided emancipation despite its inefficiency
منابع مشابه
Adam Smith’s real views on slavery: a reply to Marvin Brown
In this short response I will confine myself to rebutting Brown’s uses and interpretations of Smith rather than addressing the wider argument of the paper. I would note however that it is not uncontroversial whether slavery was economically more productive than employing ‘freemen’ (Smith certainly thought not), even though there was certainly profit to be made in the slavery business. This refl...
متن کاملبررسی چرایی پیوستن جنگجویان خارجی به داعش
ISIS represent portrait of the supra-national youths crowd from different parts of the world including Europe and the U.S.A. This constructed and destructive community, to a great extent, is an outcome of the speedy and universal mobilization of foreign fighters from around the world. World Jihadists’ entrance to the Islamic world and their extremist and defiant inclination is not a new phenome...
متن کاملبحران سوریه و افزایش دیاسپورای مسلمانان در اروپا
The internal crisis in Syria, which began in 2011, continues to have devastating consequences for its people. In addition, Syrian conflict and violence have led to the displacement of people, the expansion of terrorism, and the escalation of political and sectarian differences, and thus creating increasing instability throughout the region. It is worth noting that almost half of the Syrian popu...
متن کاملAdam Smith’s theory of absolute advantage and the use of doxography in the history of economics
This article reconstructs Adam Smith’s theory of international trade and compares it with the way it is presented in modern textbooks as the theory of absolute advantage. This textbook presentation falls short of Smith’s original ideas. I argue that the reason for this is the doxographic reconstruction of Smith’s theory to fit him into a Whig history of international trade theory. In this way t...
متن کامل